
News
Police Blotter
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Lake County briefs: Diabetes program scheduled for Aug. 12
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Healthbeat: Heavy backpacks are weighing children down
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Two residents push for village to televise meetings
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
To Your Good Health: National Night Out a reminder that health, safety go hand in hand
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Assessment declines should hearten county homeowners
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Do you own a miniature schnauzer?
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Upcoming events: Car Raffle
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Realty InSites: Tax exemptions help some homeowners
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Roundup: Lenz paces Cougars at invite; Cat wrestlers win triple dual
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
9 Great Kitchen Cabinet Upgrades
Sliding Door Tune-Up
Riding the Preservation Rails
I’m excited about a new trend in preservation I’ve been reading about recently–the restoration of old train stations and depots across the country. I don’t know if it can really be considered a new trend, as historic societies and preservation organizations have been working to save the stations and depots that have played such an important part in our county’s history for many years. I think the movement might just be getting more publicity now, but that’s fine, too.
I’m excited personally because I like trains; they are one of my favorite ways to travel. It wasn’t that long ago that railroads ruled in this country; if you needed to get from one place to another, it usually involved taking a train. Every city had at least one station such as Grand Central Station and Pennsylvania Station in New York, and small towns were often identified by their train depots.
Old Train Depots Are Often near Old Houses
I’m also excited because the railroad depot was normally located in the heart of a small town, in a place that was convenient for those arriving and departing by train. The depot was close to the homes and businesses that defined the town and was often used as a place for the community to gather. Unfortunately times have changed and what was once the thriving center of a town is very often now an area full of old houses in need of restoration and businesses that shut their doors years ago.
The Preservation Journey Starts with the First Step
Train depots that have been restored or are undergoing restoration may be able to start a preservation movement in some of those towns. I mentioned in an earlier post that I live in an old railroad town where many of the old houses that once belonged to railroad employees have been restored. Quite a few of those restorations are because the town has been building on its heritage as an old railroad town and making the railroad depot a popular attraction. Buildings that have been empty for many years are now the homes of a bakery, a coffee shop, and an ice cream parlor.
Sometimes all it takes is for one key historic building to undergo a restoration and before long an entire section of a town or city has been transformed by preservation enthusiasts. I am watching it happen in my town and it has happened in places like El Paso, Texas, Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, and Shepherdstown, West Virginia. Railroads played an important part in making this country what it is today, and who knows–maybe the preservation of their stations and depots can help lead the way in saving some of our history.
Small Old Houses and Tiny New Houses
I’m in the process of buying an old house. A small old house.
How small?
The roof indicates the original size of this small old house: 648 square feet.
The house was originally built in 1905 and was 24 feet by 27 feet, for a grand total of 648 square feet. That included a kitchen, a living room, and a bedroom. No bathroom. Well, not an indoor one with plumbing, at least.
The outdoor root cellar was converted to a bathroom and my grandpa added an enclosed front porch in the 1950s, bringing my total square footage to 984.
When I was looking at homes in this and other rural communities, I was looking for a one- or two-bedroom house. Why? I’m a single gal with a dog and no kids. How much space do I really, truly need? Because I was looking for a smaller space, all the homes I looked at were old. Somehow I came to the conclusion that a lot of older homes were small, especially because of the historic trend of new homes getting bigger and bigger.
But that’s not true.
Of the single, detached houses built before the 1920s, only 3.2 percent of houses were the size of my house! By pre-1920s standards, I still had a small house. Here are the details, courtesy of the Census Bureau:
- Less that 500 sq. ft.: 1.2%
- 500-749: 3.2%
- 750-999: 5.8%
- 1,000-1,499: 22.9%
- 1,500-1,999: 23.4%
- 2,000-2,499: 17.7%
- 2,500-2,999: 9.5%
- 3,000-3,999: 9.5%
- 4,000+: 6.7%
The number of rooms in a house was also much higher than I expected. Almost 70 percent of homes built before 1920 had six or more rooms. My house? In the bottom two percent. While I’m surprised that so many old houses were and are bigger than mine, it doesn’t make me regret buying a space that meets my needs.
Personally, I have never had much interest in keeping up with the Joneses, despite the historical trend we’ve seen in the United States. In 1973, the average square footage of a home was 1,660 sq. ft. That trend continued to climb until it reached its peak in 2008 at 2,519 (side note: houses in metropolitan areas are on average 300 square feet bigger).
Recently, though that trend has reversed. Homes are getting smaller. Sociologists, economists and other-ists have their theories, some of which include the recession. Other theories include cultural shifts resulting from urban congestion or increasing environmental awareness and responsibility. How old is the old adage “less is more,” and is it finally applying to homes? Whatever the reason, new homes are shrinking.
In 2009, the average was 2,438 sq. ft., but the downsizing trend continues.
How small?
Architect Jay Shafer designs tiny houses. Like, really tiny. They range from 65 to 774 square feet. His own home is 96 sq. ft. He sleeps in a two-person loft and his entire bathroom is his shower. The reasons why he’s lived in three houses all less than 100 feet over the past 10 years include that he doesn’t like vacuuming or dusting, or taking care of a lot of stuff he’s not really using. He’s also not spewing extra gases into the environment or consuming resources just because of a need for wasted space.
Too small?
Whether you’re into small old houses or tiny new houses, there is something to be said for being aware of your personal need of space as it relates to both cost and the environment. How much space do you need?
Fixing Running Toilets and Dripping Faucets
Teen with autism gets opportunity to be a model
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Lenhoff: The car/bicycle debate rolls on
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Property Transfers
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
The Fixer: Disconnect on fee for canceling
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)
Teen enjoys work at Israel archaeological expedition
Publication: Libertyville Review (IL)






